← The collection

Monopsony.

Set employment for a single employer and inspect marginal labour cost.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / P49

Monopsony

Set employment for a single employer and inspect marginal labour cost.

PLAY & EXPLAIN

One employer faces labour supply wage w = 10+L and marginal revenue product 100−L. All workers receive the same selected wage, so recruiting one more worker also raises pay to existing workers.

060
Wage
30.00
Marginal revenue product
80.00
Marginal labour cost
50.00
Employer profit
1200.00

Try maximising profit before revealing the benchmark. This static single-employer model assumes one wage and differentiable curves; it is not evidence about an actual employer or a complete minimum-wage analysis.

One uniform-wage employer, known curves and a static market are assumed. This is not evidence about an actual employer or a full minimum-wage policy model.

THE SHORT VERSION

Monopsony, explained.

Monopsony is buyer-side market power; in a simple labour model an employer recognises that hiring more can raise the wage it must pay.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Uniform wage supply is 10+L, marginal revenue product is 100−L and marginal labour cost is 10+2L. Profit is maximised at L=30 and wage 40, compared with competitive L=45 and wage 55.

Monopsony is buyer-side market power; in a simple labour model an employer recognises that hiring more can raise the wage it must pay.

Read the result

Marginal labour cost includes the wage effect on existing workers. Compare a complete profit calculation with the wage alone.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Find the single employer’s hiring benchmark

  1. Vary employment while reading wage 10+L and marginal revenue product 100−L.

  2. Inspect profit near L thirty, where marginal revenue product equals marginal labour cost 10+2L.

  3. Reveal the competitive benchmark L forty-five and distinguish its wage condition from the employer’s marginal-cost condition.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Uniform wage supply is 10+L, marginal revenue product is 100−L and marginal labour cost is 10+2L. Profit is maximised at L=30 and wage 40, compared with competitive L=45 and wage 55.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Distinguish the wage paid to a new worker from the extra total cost of expanding employment.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“Hiring cost for one additional worker is only that worker’s wage.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

With a uniform wage that rises with employment, expanding the workforce also raises pay for existing workers in this model.

What this explanation leaves out

  • One uniform-wage employer, known curves and a static market are assumed. This is not evidence about an actual employer or a full minimum-wage policy model.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Does this prove a particular employer has monopsony power?

No. The single-buyer structure and curves are stipulated, and actual market power requires evidence beyond this illustrative calculation.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Which payments to existing workers change when employment expands?

Associated thinkers

Associated withJoan Robinson ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.