← The collection

Trophic Cascade.

Remove a top predator and trace indirect changes through a three-level food web.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / P13

Trophic Cascade

Remove a top predator and trace indirect changes through a three-level food web.

TEST THE MECHANISM

Plants feed herbivores, which feed a top predator. Compare the same initial plants (60) and herbivores (15), with either zero or five top predators.

0.050.0100.0
Three-level consumer–resource model · Scale 0.0 to 100.0 · 0 model time unitsPlantsHerbivoresPredators
Plant index
60.00
Herbivore index
15.00
Predator index
5.00

Top predators can indirectly release plants from grazing. Fixed illustrative rates and deterministic equations omit alternative food, behaviour, migration and real species data; not every food web has this response.

Fixed invented rates and deterministic population indices omit alternative food, behaviour, migration and species data. Not every ecosystem shows the same cascade.

THE SHORT VERSION

Trophic Cascade, explained.

A trophic cascade is an indirect effect of consumers on organisms at another trophic level through changes in intermediate consumers.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Plants grow logistically and feed herbivores, which feed a top predator. Two runs start with identical plant and herbivore indices but differ in top-predator presence, exposing direct and indirect interactions.

A trophic cascade is an indirect effect of consumers on organisms at another trophic level through changes in intermediate consumers.

Read the result

Compare matching time horizons and initial plant and herbivore states. A top-predator change can have indirect consequences without a direct predator–plant link.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Remove a consumer one level above the grazer

  1. Run the three-level system with the initial top predator present.

  2. Restart without the predator while retaining the same initial plant and herbivore indices.

  3. Compare both direct consumer responses and later vegetation rather than assuming every population changes in the same direction.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Plants grow logistically and feed herbivores, which feed a top predator. Two runs start with identical plant and herbivore indices but differ in top-predator presence, exposing direct and indirect interactions.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Examine vegetation as well as herbivore counts when interpreting a predator change.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“A predator affects only the species it directly eats.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

Changing an intermediate consumer can indirectly affect another trophic level, although food-web alternatives can alter the sign and size of the response.

What this explanation leaves out

  • Fixed invented rates and deterministic population indices omit alternative food, behaviour, migration and species data. Not every ecosystem shows the same cascade.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Are these curves an estimate for a named ecosystem?

No. Rates and starting indices are invented to expose a possible interaction, with no empirical species calibration.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Which indirect pathway should you inspect beyond the first visible interaction?

Associated thinkers

Associated withRobert Paine ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.