← The collection

New Riddle of Induction.

Compare rival predicates that fit every past observation but project different future colours.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / P70

New Riddle of Induction

Compare rival predicates that fit every past observation but project different future colours.

CONSIDER & COMPARE

Compare “all emeralds are green” with “all emeralds are grue,” where grue means green if first observed before cutoff T and blue otherwise. Every emerald observed so far was seen before T and was green.

Same past fit, different future projection
RuleFits observed green emeraldsPrediction for a newly observed emerald
GreenYesBefore T: green
GrueYesBefore T: green
Which projection is justified?

The new riddle of induction asks what distinguishes projectible predicates when past observations fit rival descriptions. The board does not reveal a scientifically discovered blue emerald or prove that arbitrary hypotheses are equally useful.

The display does not reveal actual colour-changing emeralds or prove every fitted hypothesis equally useful. Predicate choice and projectibility remain philosophical questions.

THE SHORT VERSION

New Riddle of Induction, explained.

Goodman’s new riddle of induction asks which predicates are projectible when different descriptions fit the same observed evidence.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Observed emeralds are green before cutoff T. The green predicate and the grue predicate both fit them, but grue predicts blue for a newly observed emerald after T under the declared definition.

Goodman’s new riddle of induction asks which predicates are projectible when different descriptions fit the same observed evidence.

Read the result

Both predicates fit the observed pre-cutoff emeralds. The board displays rival projections rather than generating evidence that one colour transition actually occurs.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Fit the same past with green and grue

  1. Observe several green emeralds before the declared cutoff time T.

  2. Compare the green and grue rules’ identical fit to those observations.

  3. Consider a newly observed emerald after T and inspect their different predictions, then articulate a principle of projectibility.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Observed emeralds are green before cutoff T. The green predicate and the grue predicate both fit them, but grue predicts blue for a newly observed emerald after T under the declared definition.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Make the assumptions behind extrapolation explicit instead of relying only on a history of matching examples.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“Any rule fitting the past is automatically as useful a projection as every other.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

The riddle asks what justifies projecting some predicates rather than others; matching observed cases alone does not provide that whole account.

What this explanation leaves out

  • The display does not reveal actual colour-changing emeralds or prove every fitted hypothesis equally useful. Predicate choice and projectibility remain philosophical questions.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Is the future emerald shown changing colour at the cutoff?

No. The board compares predicate-defined predictions and does not assert a physical process or future observation that settles the philosophical issue.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

What makes the description you extrapolate more projectible than an alternative that fits the same history?

Associated thinkers

Associated withNelson Goodman ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.