← The collection

Implementation Intentions.

Build two if–then rules and inspect how they route a sequence of everyday events.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / M10

Implementation Intentions

Build two if–then rules and inspect how they route a sequence of everyday events.

PLAY & EXPLAIN

Build two explicit if–then plans for a fictional work session. Run the event cards to inspect which actions the rules actually trigger.

Gollwitzer’s implementation intentions specify a cue and response. This deterministic rule runner illustrates plan specificity; it does not assign productivity points, predict follow-through or establish that a particular plan suits a real person’s needs.

The ledger demonstrates cue–action rules, not measured habit change, adherence or productivity improvement.

THE SHORT VERSION

Implementation Intentions, explained.

An implementation intention links a specified situational cue to a planned response: if this occurs, then I will do that.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

The reader assigns actions to a new-message cue and a work-block cue. A six-event ledger applies those exact rules, showing their consequences without inventing productivity gains.

An implementation intention links a specified situational cue to a planned response: if this occurs, then I will do that.

Read the result

The event ledger applies your exact cue–action rules. It does not estimate how often you would follow them outside the interface.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Turn an intention into an event rule

  1. Choose a concrete action for the new-message cue and another for the start of a work block.

  2. Run the authored sequence and inspect which events trigger which chosen actions.

  3. Revise a rule if its literal application would interrupt the goal you meant it to support.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

The reader assigns actions to a new-message cue and a work-block cue. A six-event ledger applies those exact rules, showing their consequences without inventing productivity gains.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Replace a vague intention to organise work with a specific trigger and a feasible response that can be checked afterwards.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“Any if–then sentence guarantees successful behaviour change.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

A cue and response must be feasible and relevant, and following the plan still depends on circumstances that this ledger does not model.

What this explanation leaves out

  • The ledger demonstrates cue–action rules, not measured habit change, adherence or productivity improvement.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Where is the productivity score?

No productivity effect is assumed or measured. The observable result is whether the stated rule routes each event to the intended action.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Is your trigger recognisable at the moment the response should occur?

Associated thinkers

Associated withPeter Gollwitzer ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.