← The collection

Debt Snowball vs Avalanche.

Pay three hypothetical debts by smallest balance or highest rate and compare both complete schedules.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / M17

Debt Snowball vs Avalanche

Pay three hypothetical debts by smallest balance or highest rate and compare both complete schedules.

TEST THE MECHANISM
Three hypothetical debts
DebtOpening balanceAnnual rateMonthly minimum
A80018%25
B20008%25
C500024%25
150600
Month paid
0
Total remaining
7800.00
Debts cleared so far
0

Both plans accrue interest, pay up to 25 per active debt, then direct the remaining fixed budget by the selected priority. Payments are reallocated after payoff; no fees, changing rates or behavioural adherence are modelled. A 240-month cap would leave any remaining debt visible.

Fixed rates, fixed minima and identical sustained budgets are assumed. No motivational benefit or personal financial recommendation is inferred; simulation caps at 240 months.

THE SHORT VERSION

Debt Snowball vs Avalanche, explained.

Debt snowball directs extra repayment to the smallest balance; debt avalanche directs it to the highest interest rate, after minimum payments.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Debts of 800, 2,000 and 5,000 have annual rates 18%, 8% and 24%. Each active debt receives up to 25 monthly, then the remaining fixed budget follows the selected priority with immediate reallocation.

Debt snowball directs extra repayment to the smallest balance; debt avalanche directs it to the highest interest rate, after minimum payments.

Read the result

Compare both schedules under the identical monthly budget. First payoff timing and total interest are separate outcomes.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Allocate one budget across three debts

  1. Inspect the three balances, rates and twenty-five-unit minimum payments before choosing a priority.

  2. Pay several months under one rule and note when a complete debt disappears from the active list.

  3. Compare complete plans under the same budget, without assuming the model captured motivation, fees or a changing income.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Debts of 800, 2,000 and 5,000 have annual rates 18%, 8% and 24%. Each active debt receives up to 25 monthly, then the remaining fixed budget follows the selected priority with immediate reallocation.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Compare interest cost and first payoff timing separately before deciding which tradeoffs matter for a realistic repayment plan.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“The quickest first payoff must minimise total interest.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

Small balances can disappear quickly even when a larger debt has a higher rate. The two objectives need not select the same repayment order.

What this explanation leaves out

  • Fixed rates, fixed minima and identical sustained budgets are assumed. No motivational benefit or personal financial recommendation is inferred; simulation caps at 240 months.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Does the model recommend a personal debt plan?

It compares declared arithmetic rules only. Actual minimums, penalties, cash-flow needs and sustained adherence can change a practical decision.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Are you optimising first completion, interest cost or a realistic ability to maintain payments?

Associated thinkers

Associated withDave Ramsey ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.