← The collection

Hick–Hyman Law.

More possible responses can increase the time needed to choose.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
Preparing the experiment…
THE SHORT VERSION

Hick–Hyman Law, explained.

The Hick–Hyman law, often called Hick's Law, relates choice response time to the uncertainty among possible responses under specified conditions.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

When several outcomes can require different actions, the user must determine which response applies. Equally likely alternatives carry more uncertainty as their number grows. A familiar organization can also reduce search and interpretation demands, which are not captured by counting choices alone.

The Hick–Hyman law relates choice response time to uncertainty about the required response under particular experimental conditions.

Read the result

Start a search and select the named item. Try multiple rounds before comparing menu sizes. The displayed bits describe theoretical uncertainty; your time includes reading and visual search, so this is not a fitted laboratory response-time curve.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Finding an action in a menu

  1. A screen offers twelve unfamiliar actions with similar labels.

  2. Grouping related actions and improving their names may help a user identify the relevant one without simply deleting choices.

  3. Evaluate the actual task: fewer visible choices may shift effort into hidden menus rather than eliminate it.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Each round selects one equally likely item from a shuffled menu. The theoretical uncertainty is log2(number of choices) bits. The recorded browser time also includes visual search; no universal timing coefficient is assumed.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Clear grouping and familiar labels can make a menu easier to navigate. Merely hiding options can also make important actions harder to find.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“Every menu should contain as few items as possible.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

Reducing visible items can add navigation or obscure needed features. Organization, familiarity and the task affect the result.

What this explanation leaves out

  • This task is an illustration, not a replication of laboratory choice-reaction experiments. Visual search, reading, familiarity and accessibility tools affect the measured time.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Do all choices have the same uncertainty?

No. The experiment uses equal selection probabilities. When some responses are much more likely, their probability distribution changes the relevant uncertainty.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Does the user face too many possibilities, unclear labels, or unnecessary search?

Associated thinkers

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.